Florian Paul Schmidt <mista.tapas@xxxxxxx> writes: > Hi, a couple of years ago I did a little midi timing benchmark which > included seq24 and sadly it had pretty bad jitter. > > https://web.archive.org/web/20071224212956/http://tapas.affenbande.org/w > ordpress/?page_id=56 > > even when patched to use a high priority. > > The website has long gone down, but the other pages in the menu might > still have some valuable information since seq24 is from way back, too : > ) > > With the arrival of jack_midi this kind of benchmarking is probably > not as important anymore, but afaik seq24 still uses alsa-midi? The documentation for Non-Sequencer seems to say that it was written by its author to address some inadequacies in Seq24, but when I tried it, it had problems of its own. It seems to have no quantize function at all (neither during or after record), and I was unable to get notes to actually start on a beat. Sometimes I still fire up Non-Sequencer just to try again and see if I was missing something. Between Seq24 and Non-Sequencer though, there are two programs addressing a very similar need with a similar type of application, each with its own unique critical bugs. It would be nice if someone could fix one of them though, because the on-the-fly loop sequencer concept is very nice and worth doing. -- - Brent Busby + =============================================== + "With the rise of social networking -- Keycorner -- + sites, computers are making people -- Recording -- + easier to use every day." ----------------+ =============================================== _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
