On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:00:47 +0000 Will Godfrey <willgodfrey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:58:09 -0500 > "jonetsu@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <jonetsu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > There's one thing clear though. If you have a sine wave with say 16 > > sampling points, much of the curves will be lost. If this is saved > > to a file and the file is resampled with 128 sampling points, it > > will not add the curves. The original is gone, the resampling does > > not know about the original source, it cannot and it will not make > > it up. > > Although it seems counter-intuitive that actually is quite wrong! Hmmmm. Not sure about intuition. A sine wave with 16 sampled points will end up like a linked list of edges. Saving that to file and resampling at 128 will only add points to the straight lines. It will not create curves as per the original. It cannot. How would it know it was a sine wave and not a guitar tone when it had to process basically what was a robotic tone ? _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
