Am 08.11.2015 um 04:22 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
On Sun, 8 Nov 2015 03:55:38 +0100, Hermann Meyer wrote:
Given the licence a other name wouldn't change that fact, as it is
simply not compatible with the DFSG, regardless how you name it.
"Packages must be placed in non-free, if they are not compliant with the
DFSG", see:
This issue is now older then 10 years, . . .
https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/09/msg00268.html
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
