On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 12:43:12PM -0800, Len Ovens wrote: > I think the reference was to qjackctl and not jack itself. The GUI > can only run one instance of jack anyway (and one instance of > itself). Qjackctl defeats any sort of logic and common sense, but that's no reason to cripple Ardour as well. > Running two jacks generally means at least one from CLI > which is where server naming makes sense. Also, more than one jack, > although useful where needed, is generally not for casual/first time > use. It takes some understanding beyond point and click. Again that's no good reason to make running Ardour with any non-default server impossible. The whole new startup logic in Ardour4 is IMHO a big regression. Probably meant to be 'user friendly' but the effect is the opposite. Ciao, -- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
