Re: Ardour Version Question: 2 versus 3?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 4 May 2015, Ivan K wrote:

I have some question regarding versions of Ardour
that people are using.

4

Currently, I am running Fedora 20, and their
software repository has two versions of Ardour available:

ardour-2.8.16-12.fc20
ardour-3.5.403-1.fc20

I seem to recall that in the past, despite
Ardour3 being available, some people were still preferring
to use Ardour2.  This seems to be supported by the
fact that Fedora offers both versions.

Why might one prefer Ardour2 over Ardour3?

A project started in A2 might be finished in A2. But then, I think also I would be using the whole OS version surounding it as well (GCDMaster for example). I personally have not had any problems moving A2 projects to A3 (and then A4) but mine are generally pretty sparse and non-complex to begin with. I make very little use of the midi editing and so that reason for moving to A3 did not effect me. However, some of the other things like the use of control surfaces does. And with things like GCDMaster no longer available because the libs it uses are not around any more (well they are around, but would interfere with the newer version lib versions) A4s improved export is also needed. The LV2 standard seems to have changed... A4 works better with the newer standard... so A2 might limit you to older plugins. A4 supports linux VSTs. There is much more than just MIDI editing to find in A3/4... even little things like the channel strip trim "pot" that appeared a short while ago.

There are reasons to stick with A2... but not many. In general, for any computer with 1g ram or more (it is hard to find a newer computer with even only 2G) and for new projects, A4 is the way to go.

In my opinion...
Ardour is worth supporting. There have been whole HW platforms that are no longer around (like the Atari ST with some of the very best MIDI sequencing) because the SW developers were not supported. There are some really useful Linux projects that are gone for the same reason. audio creation in the Linux world is a very small group of people... the everything in Linux is free attitude, has kept some kinds of SW from really developing well here.

Quite honestly, Ardour is the first SW I have put money into since I bought some stuff for the ST megga2. I have gotten to the point where I either did that or bought something closed. The A3 that comes from the repo is fine as a demo, but the support and updates from the Ardour site are worth paying for... and the features I would like to see down the road are worth support as well.

--
Len Ovens
www.ovenwerks.net

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux