On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Emanuele Rusconi <emarsk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Paul, please be aware that people that uses software to work can be VERY
conservative, I think it's at the very least understandable and that
it's a choice that don't deserve to be insulted, especially when the
transition to A3 is not been so smooth.
I've tried to be as clear as I can: if Ardour 2.x works for your workflow then keep using it as you see fit. But do not suggest that 2.x is somehow a superior choice for anybody else. To do so is to essentially reduce the work that many developers have put in over many years to nothing. I am not insulting people who feel that Ardour 2.x is perfect for them - I am just unhappy to see it promoted as in any way better than 4.0.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
