On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 04:14:14PM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote: > >Yeah, that's neat but I prefer to handle it at the window-manager > >level rather than having some apps with "multi" support and some not. > >So I can do the same thing with any terminal :-) > >(and yes, it only puts one item on the taskbar.) > > > > Sure. I use flux but don't use tabs as they take up too much room. fluxbox hasn't used actual tabs in a while... it takes up no extra room now. >This > is nice (for me) jsut because I don't have to associate the different > terminals in a group. sure, but that's one line in ~/.fluxbox/groups . and every now and then it's really nice to be able to group windows from arbitrary applications. e.g. group a GUI app with a terminal on which it's spewing stderr. > To each his own. I was thinking that those who do not use flux might > find this useful. If not I apologize for wasting the bandwidth. no apology needed! aterm is cool and not everybody will like fluxbox. -- Paul Winkler http://www.slinkp.com
