On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:52:39 +0200 Tom <tom@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * [Wednesday 11 August 2004 13:46] Erik de Castro Lopo: > > > Written in C (unlike (flux|black)box which is C++). > > Why is that an advantage? I don't like looking at my own C++ code let alone other peoples. At least with C, if the code compiles, its rarely too blecherous for me to look at and usually trivial to fix even if it isn't. For C++ code the flaws are often in the design which makes it easier to rewrite from scratch than it is to fix it. > True, true. You might have a look at PekWM, too. Thats C++. No thanks, not while I have one in a C. Erik -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Erik de Castro Lopo nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Yes it's valid) +-----------------------------------------------------------+ "The RIAA is obsessed to the point of comedy with the frustration of having its rules broken, without considering whether such rules might be standing in the way of increased revenues. Indeed, Napster and Gnutella may turn out to be the two best music-marketing gimmicks yet devised, if only the RIAA would take its head out of its ass long enough to realise it." -- Thomas C Greene on www.theregister.co.uk
