On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 01:15:42PM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote: > Paul Winkler wrote: > <SNIP> > >I'll probably pick up one or two of the V67 myself one of these days. > >I don't have it currently, I have the MXL 1006 which is okay but > >to my ears it has a pretty harsh top end and by most accounts the V67G > >is significantly better than most of the other MXL mics > >(the other oft-reported winner is the 603). > <SNIP> > > Might have even guessed what you report from looking at the frequency > reponse curves on their web site. (Nice little web site actually) > Assuming their graphs represent your mic, the 1006 starts getting peaky > above 2K and all of the high end is above 0 on their graph, while the > V67 appears much flatter. Yeah, but I don't believe freq response graphs from ANY manufacturer anyway :-) The thing with the 1006 is that i can't seem to tame the peak to my taste with EQ. It still sounds a bit harsh even with the treble heavily rolled off. Dunno what accounts for that. Might be partly my mackie preamps which are not exactly the gentlest-sounding things around :-) -- Paul Winkler http://www.slinkp.com
