On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 02:50:05PM +0300, Juhana Sadeharju wrote: > >From: Dave Robillard <drobilla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >> PVM? That way you could stretch it across a cluster. > > > >aaaand yet again OSC. :) > > MPI has replaced PVM because PVM was cumbersome to use. > Considering that, could it be that OSC is as cumbersome to > use as PVM? > > Anyone would like to post a short code which creates, sends > and receives OSC messages? I could then compare it to the > MPI and PVM examples and find out which one is closer to OSC. That would depend on the API, not the protocol, but there are some liblo examples here: http://plugin.org.uk/liblo/examples/ - Steve
