It's a brick-wall, lookahead limiter. Crank the input volume and watch the output meter. The farther you look ahead the gentler the slope to the absolute limit but it's still a brick wall. Jan On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 15:12, R Parker wrote: > > --- derek holzer <derek@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Ron, > > > > R Parker wrote: > > > Derek, I think you can ignore that error. Does > > JAMin > > > start and do you have a working limiter? > > > > Of course, yes it starts, but I wondered what > > limiter it chooses then? A > > hard limiter, or the other lookahead limiter? > > I can't swear by this but I think it's a lookahead. > Steve or one of the other guys will need to tell us. > > Do you, or anyone else, have an informed opinion for > whether lookahead or hard is the most appropriate and > why? In all honesty, I don't know. JAMin is headed for > a 1.0 release and I think it would be interesting to > debate whether we're using the best limiter for the > job. Steve and I have briefly touched on this topic a > couple times. It could be that we're using the > appropriate limiter. > > ron > > > Checking the flattened > > peaks of some of my Jamin-processed files, I might > > almost think it is a > > hard, brickwall limiter. > > > > d. > > > > > > -- > > derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl > > ---Oblique Strategy # 115: > > "Make a sudden, destructive unpredictable action; > incorporate" > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs > http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover
