The only difference between the one you're using now and the one it can't find is latency. They're both brick-wall limiters. You don't want anything over 0dB passing through. Jan On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 15:02, derek holzer wrote: > Ron, > > R Parker wrote: > > Derek, I think you can ignore that error. Does JAMin > > start and do you have a working limiter? > > Of course, yes it starts, but I wondered what limiter it chooses then? A > hard limiter, or the other lookahead limiter? Checking the flattened > peaks of some of my Jamin-processed files, I might almost think it is a > hard, brickwall limiter. > > d. > > > -- > derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl > ---Oblique Strategy # 115: > "Make a sudden, destructive unpredictable action; incorporate"
