On Friday 23 April 2004 10.20, Daniel James wrote: > > Just for the record since this is the second time I read this: > > Agnula offers both a Debian based system (DeMuDi) and one that is > > Red Hat-based (ReHMuDi). > > That's true, but most of the community development is taking place on > the Debian version. There aren't a lot of questions from users of > ReHMuDi on the Agnula lists either - users mostly seem to be trying > out DeMuDi. > > As I understand it, what happened was that the Agnula distribution was > originally planned to be Debian based only, then Red Hat France got > involved and ReHMuDi was proposed as an addition to the project. > Perhaps it's because Planet CCRMA already exists that ReHMuDi hasn't > spawned much of a community so far. To add to the confusion. I use Mandrake myself with great success. I think a list of distros that aim for multimedia would looks something like this: - Mandrake (especially with Thac's rpms, rpm.nyvalls.se, very fresh) - Suse (a lot of stuff is included in the main distro, including lowlatency patched kernels) - Redhat/Fedora + CCRMA (Looks good and diverse, CCRMA is where all the good stuff is) - Agnula (should be a big name, multimedia is what confirms their existence, I know too little though) - Dynebolic ( live-cd based, don't know much about it) /Robert
