i understand the frustration behind the vendetta, as i too had tons of trouble getting the quattro to work on 2.4.x and was pretty irked when it looked like 2.6.x wasnt going to support it period, but i just dont see the need to call it a "total piece of junk" everytime the quattro comes up on a list, especially now that that it seems that the troubles with the quattro are historical. and yeah, i have much respect for frank, i'm not trolling him, i just dont want people to get a mistaken impression of the quattro as i'm quite happy with it. Matthew Allen wrote: >I never saw it as a vendetta, just more of a "this thing stole months of >my life away, please don't let it steal months from yours" > >:) > >m. > > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: linux-audio-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-audio- >>user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Josh Steiner >>Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Quattro USB >> >>i really just need to point out that frank seems to have a personal >>vendetta against the quattro. it does violate the USB spec in a minor >> >> > > > > >_________________________________________________ >Scanned on 21 Apr 2004 17:50:42 >Scanning by http://erado.com > > -- ________________________________________________________________ live experimental electronic music -- http://bluevitriol.com independent u.s. drum'n'bass -- http://vitriolix.com
