On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 03:50:00PM +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: > > Does it mean, that, indead, we (all CD-listeners) listen DAMAGED with such > compressing music? I don't mean any music/sound engineering work! I'm saying > about market demands Yes. The demand is often from the producer or performer, as in the case that started the thread, where the client simply wanted his CD LOUDER than the competition. Unfortunately that's what everyone else wants too... When it gets broadcast on the radio it gets compressed even more :-( > If it is true (i.e., a market demands to damage music) - are there any > (software) tools to anti-compress a dynamic range? You can't get the original back - even if you knew exactly what compression settings were applied it would be difficult, and when you don't know, and it's different for every album and even every track, there's no hope at all. > P.S. I'd like to repeat, I don't say about engineers work - they try to do > their work as good as possible, I think. I'm saying about a market > influence to music quality. Re-educating the public is the only answer - any volunteers? :-) There is a case for compressing music when it's listened to in a noisy environment. Sadly that's almost everywhere these days, but in a car is is good common example of an environment where sound compression is really helpful. I've tried it with a minidisc of some chamber music, and while the result isn't terribly musical, at least it's nearly all audible while driving. -- Anahata anahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Tel: 01638 720444 http://www.treewind.co.uk Mob: 07976 263827
