Hi, On Tuesday 13 April 2004 14.14, R Parker wrote: > Hi Robert, > > What I mean by destructive is the outfile replaces the > infile. With Ardour undo can revert but the original > file is destroyed--shut down Ardour and the undo > history is lost. True, though, during editing in Ardour normalization does probably not make sense, Ardour stores everything as float anyway making the point moot... I think? > Not sure what you mean by "in the > 'peak' sense." Somebody else noted, I think it was Jan, that there is 'rms'-normalization also. In my mind that sounds more destructive. /Robert > > ron > > --- Robert Jonsson <robert.jonsson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > On Monday 12 April 2004 23.45, R Parker wrote: > > > Hi Jan, > > > > > > I did some testing with normalization yesterday > > > > and > > > > > it's not what I need. Normalization, it appears to > > > > me, > > > > > is simply a destructive gain tool. > > > > Normalization should, atleast in the 'peak' sense, > > be totally nondestructive. > > > > /Robert > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway > http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/
