Thanks felipe, Joe, Lee. The considered opinion of the masses seems to be that no-one knows. Not even the Agnula/Demudi developers, but they'd be fascinated to find out exactly how broken my system ends up under sarge. Well, I suppose that makes it worth trying :-/ cheers anyway tim hall On Friday 10 October 2003 15:57, Lee Azzarello wrote: > On Friday 10 October 2003 07:51 am, Joe Button wrote: > > On Thursday 09 Oct 2003 10:44 pm, tim hall wrote: > > > I'm thinking of moving up to Sarge from Woody. I know DeMuDi works with > > > Sid. Does anyone know anything about testing (sarge) that would break > > the > DeMuDi packages? > > > > Since the sid packages look to be very old (judging by the ftp server > > timestamps) I would expect everything they were depending on to be in > > Sarge by now. Can't say for sure though. > > > > Does anyone know much about demudi/Agnula? It looks pretty moribund > > judging by the website. I think an audio-centric distro would be a great > > thing, but I'm not sure if this one's going anywhere. > > Although not audio-specific, I have a lot of hope for Gentoo Linux. It's > based on source code has a good build system and is very up to date. On Friday 10 October 2003 12:09, felipe wrote: > sorry I didn't mean to scare you. Many things are changed from woody to > sarge.. I'm using woody plus a number of additional packages compiled > from sources (i.e. audio, kde), since some sid packages would even break > libc compatibility... so you might ask the debian guys at irc.debian.org > what the situation with woody->sarge is. > hope this helps
