On Thursday 09 October 2003 21:56, Tim Orford wrote: > On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 08:35:05PM -0500, Aaron Trumm wrote: > > well I've been googling, and reading and googling and boogling and > > moogling and juggling and fuggling and tuggling for hours upon hours and > > I still have this question... > > > > "So, are you all telling me that there are no sequencers for linux that > > support a simple sysex dump and sysex receive, you know, by taking a .syx > > file and throwing it out to the machine?" > > i'm not saying the situation is good, but i cant see a good > argument for integrating this functionality into a 'sequencer'. > I think many people would say that creating bloated monolithic > apps was the wrong direction to go in. > Well, if he needs this functionality in a sequencer, then maybe he needs to send sys-ex in real-time, in which it would be mighty convenient to have it in the sequencer. But then of course you need replacable parameters, etc. Or even if it's just downloading in bulk before the sequence starts, I can't see why you _wouldn't_ want this capability in the sequencer. Why make more work for the user? Larry
