On Friday 07 November 2003 09:43 am, Austin wrote: > On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 10:31, Brian Redfern wrote: > > Also is 256 megs of ram enough to run jackd well, or do I > > need more like 500megs or more? > > Since you'll want to mount /tmp in ram, more is better. I've monitored > mine (with 500 MB), and it never seems to fill up, so I think that's > adequate. More is always better, but jackd runs without complaint alongside Hydrogen, zynAddSubFX, and Ardour, on my system with 256. If you've got a few extra dollars, putting some more memory in couldn't hurt things, but 256 has been adequate for me :) |) |)enji
