On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 02:46:16 +0100, Tim Hall wrote: > On Thursday 15 May 2003 11:20, Steve Harris wrote: > > I have been considering a mailing list so I can get consensus on bug > > reports, if there are enough interested people I'l set one up. > > I've only just started using the swh & ladspa plug-ins in conjunction with > 'sweep'. While we're on this thread my immediate reaction is to the general > labelling - great if you're an engineer - a bit confusing if you're 'just' a > musician trying to make the best of a previously analogue recording. It would > be useful to have a plain language description of what the plug-in is > supposed to do when you bring it up and also what units you're entering, > possibly with a suggested range. This is a valid point. One problem is that I generaly design them assuming that there will be a UI at some point, but this has never happened. > Scuse if this is a bit OT, and yes, you're damn right, I didn't RTFM yet :-) http://plugin.org.uk/ladspa-swh/docs/ladspa-swh.html ;) the docs could definatly do with work though. - Steve
