Jaakko, It creates fftw.h and rfftw.h, no prefix. Of course, the big question is why did it work in 0.3.6 and not in 0.3.7. Jan On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 14:45, Jaakko Prättälä wrote: > On Saturday 08 March 2003 21:29, Jan \"Evil Twin\" Depner wrote: > > checking for fftw_one in -lsfftw... no > > checking for fftw_one in -lfftw... no > > configure: error: Could not find working fftw library. Package now > > requires it > > > > I have installed fftw-2.1.3. I have tried it installed in /usr and > > /usr/local with the same results. Running gcc 2.96 on RH 7.3. > > I've sometimes had some problems with the two header > naming conventions in fftw. There's an option for fftw's > configure-script to specify whether you want the header files > with or without type prefix. IIRC Red Hat 7.3 comes _with_ > type prefix, so it might be that you have files drfftw.h and dfftw.h > for double-precision and/or srfftw.h & sfftw.h (was it?) for single precision. > FFTW's configure-script defaults to no prefix. > Maybe the swh-plugins configure-script is looking for files without > the 'd' or the 's': rfftw.h and fftw.h. When I was using 7.3 I just made > symlinks. > > -- > Jaakko Prättälä > Jaakko.Prattala@xxxxxxxxxxx >
