On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 11:38:08PM -0400, Jesse Chappell wrote: > Sweep has a great interface, but it still has one significant > downside: all the audio is loaded into memory. This prevents > the effective editing of large soundfiles or sessions unless you > have a ton of memory (or it will swap all over you). Is there a significant difference between having (a) the audio editing program or (b) the memory manager decide what to keep in physical memory and what to swap to disk? -- Anahata anahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Tel: 01638 720444 http://www.treewind.co.uk Mob: 07976 263827
