[linux-audio-user] alsa +laptop +performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> dietrich heese boutin <dietrich.heese.boutin@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

  > I am looking to install alsa on a laptop along with something for
  > more reasonable sound such as a Roland ua-20...  So far I have
  > heard that alsa does not work, only oss, and that the latency that
  > can be expected with such a set up is worth neglect.

Although I don't have much experience with the usb-audio module, the
details at alsa-project.org indicate that it's well beyond the
limitations you mention. However, I _can_ speak to the fact that ALSA
is certainly capable of very good low-latency performance on a laptop.

http://www.alsa-project.org/alsa-doc/doc-php/template.php3?company=Edirol&card=UA-20&chip=&module=usb-audio

_I've_ been getting excellent results using the RME Hammerfall DSP
(Cardbus interface) for live multitrack recording with ALSA, a patched
low-latency kernel, JACK, and ecasound or Ardour.

-- 
Roger Williams <raw@xxxxxxx>
Qux Tool & Die, Middleborough, Massachusetts
// Omne tulit punctum qui misquit utile dulci //


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux