On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 19:07, Mark Knecht wrote: > On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 16:46, Jan "Evil Twin" Depner wrote: > > I actually think XFS would be a good solution, however, as Mark Knecht > > said, it doesn't come with kernel I'm using. It may also not be as > > stable as reiserfs, I just don't know. Reiserfs works well for me so > > I'll wait until XFS has been beaten on for a while. > > I was told by the XFS design team that to use it on 2.4.X you have to > patch. I subscribed to the XFS reflector for a while and found that the > number and type of problems I was hearing about were too scary for me, > so I passed for now. > > They tell me that it will be a file system option in 2.5.X, and indeed > it's there in the make sconfig build script, but I have not tried it. No > time. > > XFS is supposed to be very good for large files, while reiser is best > for small files. Hence, we could hope that XFS eventually becomes a good > option. Look for 2.7.X or 2.9.X..... I set it up with Red Hat 8 or Mandrake or something... {I set up a lot of stuff last month. It's been a while since I've really used linux... I wanted to experiment.} :} I did a backup on that drive not realizing that I'd never see it again. {I just have to move everything off of the cds again... still, it's a pain.} I finally managed to download Demudi though... I may try it again... -- Rick Taylor <ricktaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> The Dispossessed