On 21 Dec 2003 21:38:35 -0600 "Jack O'Quin" <joq@xxxxxx> wrote: > On my system, the vanilla 2.6 with preemption is usable for audio, but > nowhere near as good at low latencies as a properly patched and tuned > 2.4 kernel. Ok, i will give it a shot to see how it goes.. > > > I somewhere read something about merging andrews LL and the > > preemptible patches. Is there any truth to that? > > We all hope so. Hmm, maybe i'll drop andrew an email to see what his thoughts and plans on the issue are.. > > > What about the 2.4.x capabilities "patch"? Will this work on 2.6.x? > > Yes, I think it will. But, 2.6 provides a mechanism for doing this as > a kernel module with no patches required. Here is an experimental > module I built based on earlier work done by Torben Hohn... > > http://www.joq.us/realtime/realtime-0.0.2.tar.gz Okay :) I will try it.. Thanks for the infos.. -- music: http://www.soundclick.com/bands/9/florianschmidt.htm
