On Saturday 20 December 2003 10:08 am, Thorsten Mika wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:12:13 +0000
>
> tim hall <tech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 17 December 2003 08:49, Thorsten Mika wrote:
> > > as a user of a "low end" machine (duron 1Ghz, 256MB)
> >
> > So 1G processors are 'low end' now? Heaven help the rest of us!
>
> I do not really think they are "low end". But my experience with jack,
> fluidsynth and timidity tells me that it reliable low latency is not
> possible. Best thing I can achieve is a latency of 92,9ms (as I said,
> with Duron 1Ghz and 256MB RAM). Setting the laten cy lower leads to JACK
> "throwing out" apps like ZynAddSubFX.
The Jack implementation in ZynAddSubFX is problematic, and is being
worked on. It is known to "zombify" very easily. I love it anyway :)
Do you have this problem frequently with other Jack applications?
|)
|)enji
