I would also second Fernando's encouragement to use OSC since that way more inter-app communication will be possible, something that we really need amidst all these diverse software packages that unfortunately often offer very little interoperability. Ivica Ico Bukvic, composer & multimedia sculptor http://meowing.ccm.uc.edu/~ico > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-audio-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-audio- > user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano > Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 6:17 PM > To: A list for linux audio users > Cc: PD-list; Maarten De Boer > Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: tapiir > > > Quoting Maarten De Boer <mdeboer@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > I think espcially OSC would be *very* interesting for Tapiir, > > > > considering how easy it may become to use Linux sound apps under Mac > OS > > > > X in the future. > > > > > > I am not familiar with OSC. netsend might be easier. What kind of > input > > > does it take? > > > > Netsend and netreceive are paired objects in PD, usually used for > connecting > > remote machines, and capable of transporting TCP or UDP messages. > Netsend takes > > an message of "connect hostname portnumber", which I suppose could be > made a > > localhost and a port in Tapiir. > > > > I still think it would be worthwhile to use OSC, as it is a wider-used > format, > > allowing communications with many more apps than PD. But it could [not > sure > > here] be a bit more work. > > It would be great if the solution is not specific to Pd (nothing against > a Pd solution as well, of course). I can think of other programs that > could benefit from "remote control" of presets (hint: freqtweak!). > > -- Fernando >
