Yeah, and (God I hate to say this) Micro$oft Excel is actually a damn good product. On it's own merits it beats the pants off just about anything else out there. Jan -----Original Message----- From: "linux-audio-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-audio-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@xxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 09:04:46 -0800 To: "John Bleichert" <syborg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "A list for linux audio users" <linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: Is the Linux desktop really here ? was: Re:[linux-audio-user]ebayguy: looks like he figured it out On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 07:01, John Bleichert wrote: > On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 eviltwin69@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > My wife is the comptroller for a US Navy activity. She is the ultimate hard-core Excel user ;-) Neither Open Office nor Gnumeric can handle the macros that she uses. > > > > Jan > > > > Yeah, I bet. That's a difficult switch. Although, to be fair, OO Calc or > Gnumeric would work fine if she chose to re-program all those macros in > their native macro languages ;-) (Does gnumeric have one? I haven't used > it in years) In my experience this isn't the way the world works. She's probably receiving Excel spreadsheets from others that already have stuff embedded that won't work with Linux tools. I ran into this problem big time when we looked at Star Office and Open Office for work. We couldn't use either as their compatibility with both Word and Excel wasn't good enough and broke our compatibility with both our vendors and our customers. As someone who runs a business, why would I want to pay someone $600 to fix 10 documents when I can buy Microsoft's tools for $300 and have guaranteed compatibility? That's a tough sell...
