On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 08:58:56 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote: > My suspicion is that the first one, which pops, is generated from 240bit > audio, whereas I'm thinking that the second is generated from 16-bit > audio, but I don't know that for sure, and ogginfo doesn't seem to tell > me. IIUC theres no "bitwidth" inside oggs, its just a representation of the shape of the input signal, so the bitdepth of the source shouldn't have a significant effect on the kind of data stored. I may be totaly wrong here though. Is there a DC offset which the cheap card is eating? - Steve
