On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 16:13:44 +0100 Mike Rawes <mike_rawes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 10:36:38 -0400 > "Lloyd R. Prentice" <lprentice@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Daniel James wrote: > > > > > > > > The Flash file format is supposed to be a published standard. > > > > > > http://www.openswf.org/ > > > > > > I don't know if there are any funny restrictions on using the > > > specification though. > > > > Thanks, Daniel. The http://www.operswf.org link seems to be broken, > > however. It's not totally clear from my Google research, but it looks > > like openswf.org was more a respository of information than an > > official standards body. Flash audio/video is coming on strong, but it > > kooks to me like Macromedia has it pretty well locked up. > > You can get the spec right here: > > http://www.macromedia.com/software/flash/open/licensing/fileformat/ Flash runs in Wine but... why not go with something a little more standardized? SVG.
