[linux-audio-user] Re: Which kernel to use for audio work?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 18:50:27 +0200
Robert Epprecht <epprecht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > For the 2.6.0-test series, you should get the latest from
> > kernel.org,
> sure...
> 
> How usable is it currently for audio?
> Which patches?

I run 2.6.0-test3 and it works quite well, although I never tried any
patched 2.4.x kernel, so I don't have a lot to compare with. I didn't
apply any patches, just selected "pre-emptive-kernel" in the
configuration. Without X I'm able to run csound with a buffersize of 64
on a medium complex analog style patch and too much polyphony to count
(P4 2400 laptop, using the buildin intel i810 soundcard).

But I'm also interrested in meassuring the performance of my system
including latency more precisely. Is there software outthere that will
to it for me in an accurate way? Are there any patches that can be
applied to the 2.6.0 kernels to improve latency?

-- 
peace, love & harmony
Atte


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux