> which license should I supply, if I just want anyone to be > > able to download it freely and - if desired - edit it, as long as > > my name still appears somewhere? > > Perhaps you might find this site interesting, regarding licensing > issues. http://creativecommons.org/ Personally, I find the Creative Commons licences flexible, but far too wordy. They are more like a contract, a EULA, or the GNU GPL than existing music licences. Almost no-one reads the GPL end to end - that's why so many people don't understand it. Look at any CD package; the licences tend to be about one paragraph long, and could be edited down to just one word - DON'T. A really good free music licence would be just as succinct. If you want to allow derivative versions, have a look at the bLiP licence. Second item down on: http://www.justablip.co.uk/phpbb/viewforum.php?f=4 Cheers Daniel
