On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 09:38:52 -0700, R Parker wrote: > That's the GNU's counter part to the GPL for > documenation? That would get my vote. However, I defer > any decision on licensing to Steve. I think Steve > should have copyright on the documentation. If I work > on it and am credited, I'm happy. Hell no. I really can't be trusted with docs, I can't spell, my grammar is terrible, you name it :) I really dont undeastand how anyone could bring themsevles to write docs without being payed or made to ;) I write code, if other people are prepared to document it then that's great. The copyright should belong to the authors. - Steve
