Steve, Can I help with the coding. I have a *lot* of C/Motif experience and I'm just getting into C++/Qt. Jan On Mon, 2003-04-07 at 15:00, Steve Harris wrote: > On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 02:40:40 +0900, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > > Steve Harris wrote: > > >On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 11:56:16PM +0900, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > > > > > >>>There will be 3 band compression, linear parametric EQ and a lookahead > > >>>limiter, maybe also a learning limiter. > > >>> > > >> > > >>Is that called time? > > > > > > > > > ? > > > > >>>maybe also a learning limiter. > > > > :) > > Ahh, yes time, but also working out a UI for it. Its kinda optional, so I > doubt it will make 0.1. > > > >If your willing to work on the UI, then maybe the thing to do is to strip > > >it down and rebuild the UI code. I can stick the current code in a public > > >CVS server somewhere (its currently on a private server), but its pretty > > >scary in its current state. > > > > I have no qualms about learning SDL unless you really think it is a bad > > idea. The thing is *learning* it but I am willing to drop (almost) > > everything and focus on it for a while. > > Well, theres almost nothing to SDL (well the parts I used anyway), I just > dont think its appropriate, I ended up writing widget code for the sliders > and stuff, which is why they suck so much. In retrosect just using GTK > would have been easier. > > > If you want I can give you ftp access to djcj.org and you can put it > > there in a semi/private place. > > The intention wasn't that it be especially private, I just didn't think > anyone else would want to work on it. I originally wanted to get beta bug > reports from a small number of people so I could handle the feedback, but > I dont think that will be a problem now. > > > >I have no particular feelings about what toolkit, as long as its C, and > > >preferably has working vertical faders, the ones in GTK-1.x are > > >inconvienient. > > > > I willing to go with the current stuff and work from there. It may be > > that it needs a complete redesign but I think it would be good to get > > something out sooner rather than later. > > Thats a good point. The current state is that I'm halfway through > refactoring the UI code to make some of the compressor controls rotary, so > its impossible to tell what its doing at the moment. The question is > wether its quicker to rescue the SDL code or replace it with GTK code or > similar. > > Is there anyone else who wants to work on this? If not I'l just leave the > code where it is for now and give Patrick a login on the machine. If there > are a few people I'l have to move it to sourceforge or something, but I > dont really want to do that cos I think theres going to be some major > structural work needs doing. > > - Steve
