Looks good to me. On Sat, 2003-04-05 at 08:44, Steve Harris wrote: > Hi all, > > After the LAD Conference and using apps which used the lrdf taxoomy > (putting plugins into categories) code it became obvious the the current > taxonomy wasn't really useful. > > the current taxnomy looks like: > > Utilities > Generators > Oscillators > Simulators > Reverbs > Time > Delays > Phasers > Flangers > Chorus > Reverbs > Frequency > Measurement > Filters > Lowpass > Highpass > Bandpass > Combs > Allpass > EQs > Parametric > Multiband > Pitch shifters > Amplitude > Amplifiers > Waveshapers > Modulators > Distortions > Dynamics > Compressors > Expanders > Limiters > Gates > > This makes a certian amount of sense from a theoretical point of view, but > isn't much use when you're trying to find a compressor. > > So, we need to deine a taxonomy that is more useful to users. > > I recon that something like this is a good start, but feedback would > really help: > > Utilities > > Generators > Oscillators > > Delays > Phasers + Allpass > Flangers > Chorus > > Reverbs > > Filters > Lowpass > Highpass > Bandpass > Combs > > EQs > Parametric > Multiband > > Pitch shifters > > Modulation > > Distortion > Amp effects > Waveshapers > > Dynamics > Compressors > Expanders > Limiters > Gates > > Feel free to suggest changes to make it easier to use. I can drop in the > new taxonomy without changing any code. As soon as we decide on a new > structure I will distribute a new .rdfs file then you can just copy it > over the old one and try it out. > > - Steve
