Re: [PATCHv5 1/4] arm64: io: Use asm-generic high level MMIO accessors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/6/2021 2:20 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 9:28 AM Sai Prakash Ranjan
<quic_saipraka@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Remove custom arm64 MMIO accessors read{b,w,l,q} and their relaxed
versions in support to use asm-generic ones. Also define arm64
barrier macros to override the asm-generic defined barriers.

Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <quic_saipraka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
This looks correct, but I would change one detail:

+#define __io_ar(v)             __io_par(v)
+#define __io_bw()              __iowmb()
+#define __io_br(v)
+#define __io_aw(v)
The default __io_par() is defined in terms of __io_ar(), so it would
be more logical
to remove the custom __io_par() and just define __io_ar() here.

Makes sense, will do this.

I think it would be even better to flip these around and make the low-level
definitions __io_ar() and __io_bw(), and then defining the arm64 specific
macros based on those:

/* arm64-specific, don't use in portable drivers */
#define __iormb(v)     __io_ar(v)
#define __iowmb()      __io_bw()
#define __iomb()        dma_mb()



So __iormb on arm64 has some dummy control dependency stuff as well based on
("arm64: io: Ensure calls to delay routines are ordered against prior readX()") and then we would need to change __iormb definition to __io_ar which doesn't seem like __iormb definition to be exact
right?

Thanks,
Sai



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux