Il 01/12/21 16:51, Marijn Suijten ha scritto:
On 2021-11-30 22:21:34, Martin Botka wrote:
Add the dispcc node from the newly added DISPCC
driver for Qualcomm Technology Inc's SM6125 SoC.
Signed-off-by: Martin Botka <martin.botka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
index 51286ddbdb10..78f4705e4117 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
* Copyright (c) 2021, Martin Botka <martin.botka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*/
+#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.h>
#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sm6125.h>
#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.h>
#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
@@ -317,6 +318,17 @@ soc {
ranges = <0x00 0x00 0x00 0xffffffff>;
compatible = "simple-bus";
+ dispcc: clock-controller@5f00000 {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <1>;
+ compatible = "qcom,dispcc-sm6125";
+ reg = <0x5f00000 0x20000>;
+ clocks = <&gcc GCC_DISP_AHB_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "cfg_ahb_clk";
It looks like this lacks all the clocks that are supposedly required as
per the yaml DT bindings provided in patch 1/3 - should those be added
and set to `<0>` where unavailable, otherwise dtbs_check may not pass?
Yes, Marijn. They should.
Please Martin, add the missing clocks for v2.
