Hi Steve, On 11/9/2021 9:19 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 17:38:21 +0530 Sai Prakash Ranjan <quic_saipraka@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Debugging a specific driver or subsystem can be a lot easier if we can trace events specific to that driver or subsystem. This type of filtering can be achieved using existing dynamic debug library which provides a way to filter based on files, functions and modules. Using this, provide an additional flag 'e' to filter event tracing to specified input. For example, tracing all MMIO read/write can be overwhelming and of no use when debugging a specific driver or a subsystem. So switch to dynamic event tracing for register accesses. Example: Tracing register accesses for all drivers in drivers/soc/qcom/* and the trace output is given below: # dyndbg="file drivers/soc/qcom/* +e" trace_event=rwmmio or # echo "file drivers/soc/qcom/* +e" > /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control # cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/traceFYI, it's best to use /sys/kernel/tracing, as the debug/tracing is only there for backward compatibility.
Ah I see, will correct it.
rwmmio_read: rpmh_rsc_probe+0x35c/0x410 readl addr=0xffff80001071000c rwmmio_read: rpmh_rsc_probe+0x3d0/0x410 readl addr=0xffff800010710004 rwmmio_write: rpmh_rsc_probe+0x3b0/0x410 writel addr=0xffff800010710d00 val=0x3 rwmmio_write: write_tcs_cmd+0x6c/0x78 writel addr=0xffff800010710d30 val=0x10108I'd much rather have a module name or something attached to the event that ca be filtered on via the trace event filters, than having it determined by some side effect done in another directory.
I presume we don't have CALLER_MODULENAME0,1,2.. like CALLER_ADDR0,1,2 without which we cannot insert the module name to this trace event since MMIO accessors are defined in low level arch headers and we won't get any useful module information from where these accessors are called. The function name and the offset is good enough to identify the exact line and module after post-processing with tools like GDB, objdump, so I feel we can keep the trace event fields limited?
Thanks, Sai
-- Steve
