Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] pinctrl: qcom: Add egpio feature support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue 26 Oct 05:07 PDT 2021, Rajendra Nayak wrote:

> From: Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> egpio is a scheme which allows special power Island Domain IOs
> (LPASS,SSC) to be reused as regular chip GPIOs by muxing regular
> TLMM functions with Island Domain functions.
> With this scheme, an IO can be controlled both by the cpu running
> linux and the Island processor. This provides great flexibility to
> re-purpose the Island IOs for regular TLMM usecases.
> 
> 2 new bits are added to ctl_reg, egpio_present is a read only bit
> which shows if egpio feature is available or not on a given gpio.
> egpio_enable is the read/write bit and only effective if egpio_present
> is 1. Once its set, the Island IO is controlled from Chip TLMM.
> egpio_enable when set to 0 means the GPIO is used as Island Domain IO.
> 
> To support this we add a new function 'egpio' which can be used to
> set the egpio_enable to 0, for any other TLMM controlled functions
> we set the egpio_enable to 1.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.h |  4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
> index 8476a8a..bfdba3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
> @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ static int msm_pinmux_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>  	unsigned int irq = irq_find_mapping(gc->irq.domain, group);
>  	struct irq_data *d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
>  	unsigned int gpio_func = pctrl->soc->gpio_func;
> +	unsigned int egpio_func = pctrl->soc->egpio_func;
>  	const struct msm_pingroup *g;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	u32 val, mask;
> @@ -218,8 +219,20 @@ static int msm_pinmux_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>  	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
>  
>  	val = msm_readl_ctl(pctrl, g);
> -	val &= ~mask;
> -	val |= i << g->mux_bit;
> +
> +	if (egpio_func && i == egpio_func) {
> +		if (val & BIT(g->egpio_present))
> +			val &= ~BIT(g->egpio_enable);
> +		else
> +			return -EINVAL;

You're returning here with pctrl->lock held and irqs disabled.

> +	} else {
> +		val &= ~mask;
> +		val |= i << g->mux_bit;
> +		/* Check if egpio present and enable that feature */

I never remember if egpio_enable means apss or lpass, so I think this
comment would be better as:

		/* Claim ownership of pin if egpio capable */

> +		if (egpio_func && (val & BIT(g->egpio_present)))

Can't you drop the parenthesis around the second expression?

Regards,
Bjorn

> +			val |= BIT(g->egpio_enable);
> +	}
> +
>  	msm_writel_ctl(val, pctrl, g);
>  
>  	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.h b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.h
> index e31a516..b7110ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.h
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.h
> @@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ struct msm_pingroup {
>  	unsigned drv_bit:5;
>  
>  	unsigned od_bit:5;
> +	unsigned egpio_enable:5;
> +	unsigned egpio_present:5;
>  	unsigned oe_bit:5;
>  	unsigned in_bit:5;
>  	unsigned out_bit:5;
> @@ -119,6 +121,7 @@ struct msm_gpio_wakeirq_map {
>   *                            to be aware that their parent can't handle dual
>   *                            edge interrupts.
>   * @gpio_func: Which function number is GPIO (usually 0).
> + * @egpio_func: Which function number is eGPIO
>   */
>  struct msm_pinctrl_soc_data {
>  	const struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins;
> @@ -136,6 +139,7 @@ struct msm_pinctrl_soc_data {
>  	unsigned int nwakeirq_map;
>  	bool wakeirq_dual_edge_errata;
>  	unsigned int gpio_func;
> +	unsigned int egpio_func;
>  };
>  
>  extern const struct dev_pm_ops msm_pinctrl_dev_pm_ops;
> -- 
> QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
> of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux