Quoting pillair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (2021-10-28 06:08:39) > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 12:05 AM > > To: Rakesh Pillai <pillair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; agross@xxxxxxxxxx; > > bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx; mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx; ohad@xxxxxxxxxx; > > p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; sibis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; mpubbise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > kuabhs@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] Add support for sc7280 WPSS PIL loading > > > > Quoting Rakesh Pillai (2021-10-03 23:48:50) > > > Add support for PIL loading of WPSS co-processor for SC7280 SOCs. > > > > > > Changes from v4/v5: > > > - Add yaml conversion for adsp/cdsp dt-bindings > > > - Change clock names in wpss dt-bindings > > > - Correct mistake in signed-off enail ID > > > > Can you keep a running tally here of the full progression of the series? > > That helps to look back and make sure we don't make a comment that has > > already been made before. > > > > One more request. Can you add support for 'firmware-name' like there is in > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt so that we > > can install firmware into some namespaced/versioned place instead of > > having to put wpss files into /lib/firmware? > > Hi Stephen, > I have posted v7 with the support for firmware-name to be provided in the DT entry. Thanks. I didn't see it in my inbox. No Cc for me? > > > It would also be nice to load a > > single firmware file instead of having to split the file into many pieces. > > This would require lot of changes and lot of code duplication from request firmware. > Also the base ath11k firmware files have been posted as split files. > Other firmwares have done it so it seems technically possible. So nothing is preventing it?
