On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 6:16 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> The ACPI_HANDLE() macro is a wrapper arond the ACPI_COMPANION()
> macro and the ACPI handle produced by the former comes from the
> ACPI device object produced by the latter, so it is way more
> straightforward to evaluate the latter directly instead of passing
> the handle produced by the former to acpi_bus_get_device().
>
> Modify l2_cache_pmu_probe_cluster() accordingly (no intentional
> functional impact).
>
> While at it, rename the ACPI device pointer to adev for more
> clarity.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
If nobody nas any concerns regarding this patch, I will queue it up
for 5.16 in the ACPI tree, because it is requisite for further
changes.
Thanks!
> ---
>
> v1 -> v2:
> * Resend with a different From and S-o-b address. No other changes.
>
> ---
> drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c
> @@ -840,17 +840,14 @@ static int l2_cache_pmu_probe_cluster(st
> {
> struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev->parent);
> struct platform_device *sdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> + struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
> struct l2cache_pmu *l2cache_pmu = data;
> struct cluster_pmu *cluster;
> - struct acpi_device *device;
> unsigned long fw_cluster_id;
> int err;
> int irq;
>
> - if (acpi_bus_get_device(ACPI_HANDLE(dev), &device))
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> - if (kstrtoul(device->pnp.unique_id, 10, &fw_cluster_id) < 0) {
> + if (!adev || kstrtoul(adev->pnp.unique_id, 10, &fw_cluster_id) < 0) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to read ACPI uid\n");
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
>
>
