Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: cpufreq: cpufreq-qcom-hw: Convert to YAML bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon 04 Oct 00:22 PDT 2021, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 12:35:31PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 04-10-21, 10:13, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > Convert Qualcomm cpufreq devicetree binding to YAML.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > I am not sure if Rob ever gave this.
> > 
> 
> I'm not fooling you :)
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pm/patch/20210701105730.322718-5-angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/#24312445
> 
> > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Why double signed off ?
> > 
> 
> Ah, it came while I applied the patch from Angelo's series. If you want
> I can send a new version removing one or you can do that while applying.
> 

If you wrote the patch, then Angelo handled it, then you handled it
again the double S-o-b captures that nicely.

Looking it from the other angle, if you remove the first S-o-b, then you
forgot to signed it off when you authored the original patch and if you
skip the last S-o-b then you didn't adequately sign off the final
result.

Regards,
Bjorn

> Let me know.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mani
> 
> > -- 
> > viresh



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux