> -----Original Message----- > From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, September 24, 2021 1:30 PM > To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: pillair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ath10k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > govinds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kuabhs@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm- > msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > youghand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Don't always treat modem stop events as > crashes > > Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Quoting pillair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (2021-09-21 22:35:34) > >> On 9/5/21 4:04 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> > >> > +static int ath10k_snoc_modem_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, > >> > +unsigned long > > [...] > >> > >> > + > >> > >> > + return NOTIFY_OK; > >> > >> > +} > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks for posting the patch. It would be preferable to use a > >> different flag instead of ATH10K_SNOC_FLAG_UNREGISTERING, > >> > >> since we are not unloading the ath10k driver. > > Weird, I don't see pillair's email on patchwork[1] and not in the ath10k list > either. Was it sent as HTML or something? Hi Kalle, Yes, I replied via the "In-reply-to" from the patchworks[1] link. Thanks, Rakesh Pillai > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux- > wireless/patch/20210905210400.1157870-1-swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > -- > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ > > https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingp > atches
