Hi Jeya,
Can you make sure the subject line reflects the patch version that you
are sending.
In this case it should be "[PATCH v2] misc: fastrpc: fix improper packet
size calculation"
this will help reviewers and maintainers to differentiate the versions
of patch.
On 21/09/2021 11:35, Jeya R wrote:
The buffer list is sorted and this is not being considered while
calculating packet size. This would lead to improper copy length
calculation for non-dmaheap buffers which would eventually cause
sending improper buffers to DSP.
Fixes: c68cfb718c8f ("misc: fastrpc: Add support for context Invoke method")
Signed-off-by: Jeya R <jeyr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Please add changes done from v1 to v2 here.
something like:
Changes from v1:
- bla bla bla..
drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
index beda610..a7e550f 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
@@ -719,16 +719,21 @@ static int fastrpc_get_meta_size(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx)
static u64 fastrpc_get_payload_size(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx, int metalen)
{
u64 size = 0;
- int i;
+ int oix = 0;
Looks like you missed to address my previous comments.
--srini
size = ALIGN(metalen, FASTRPC_ALIGN);
- for (i = 0; i < ctx->nscalars; i++) {
+ for (oix = 0; oix < ctx->nbufs; oix++) {
+ int i = ctx->olaps[oix].raix;
+
+ if (ctx->args[i].length == 0)
+ continue;
+
if (ctx->args[i].fd == 0 || ctx->args[i].fd == -1) {
- if (ctx->olaps[i].offset == 0)
+ if (ctx->olaps[oix].offset == 0)
size = ALIGN(size, FASTRPC_ALIGN);
- size += (ctx->olaps[i].mend - ctx->olaps[i].mstart);
+ size += (ctx->olaps[oix].mend - ctx->olaps[oix].mstart);
}
}
