Quoting Prasad Malisetty (2021-08-09 21:08:34)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> index 53a21d0..4500d88 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> @@ -1598,6 +1712,18 @@
> bias-bus-hold;
> };
> };
> +
> + pcie1_default_state: pcie1-default-state {
> + clkreq {
> + pins = "gpio79";
> + function = "pcie1_clkreqn";
> + };
> +
> + wake-n {
> + pins = "gpio3";
> + function = "gpio";
This is function gpio, so presumably board designers could decide to
change the wake gpio to something else, right? I'd prefer we move wake-n
to the board level (idp) as well. gpio79 looks fine as it is muxed to be
the pcie1_clkreqn function, not gpio, so it seems to be a dedicated pin
for this purpose.
