On 7/3/2021 6:24 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
rpmhpd_aggregate_corner() takes a corner as parameter, but in
rpmhpd_power_off() the code requests the level of the first corner
instead.
In all (known) current cases the first corner has level 0, so this
change should be a nop, but in case that there's a power domain with a
non-zero lowest level this makes sure that rpmhpd_power_off() actually
requests the lowest level - which is the closest to "power off" we can
get.
While touching the code, also skip the unnecessary zero-initialization
of "ret".
Fixes: 279b7e8a62cc ("soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Add RPMh power domain driver")
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c
index 2daa17ba54a3..fa209b479ab3 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c
@@ -403,12 +403,11 @@ static int rpmhpd_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)
static int rpmhpd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)
{
struct rpmhpd *pd = domain_to_rpmhpd(domain);
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret;
mutex_lock(&rpmhpd_lock);
- ret = rpmhpd_aggregate_corner(pd, pd->level[0]);
-
+ ret = rpmhpd_aggregate_corner(pd, 0);
This won't work for cases where pd->level[0] != 0, rpmh would just ignore this and keep the
resource at whatever corner it was previously at.
(unless command DB tells you a 0 is 'valid' for a resource, sending a 0 is a nop)
The right thing to do is to send in whatever command DB tells you is the lowest level that's valid,
which is pd->level[0].
if (!ret)
pd->enabled = false;
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
