Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: pwm: add IPQ6018 binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2021-06-03 04:35, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Mon 24 May 05:20 CDT 2021, Baruch Siach wrote:

DT binding for the PWM block in Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: Make #pwm-cells const (Rob Herring)
---
.../devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f85ce808a14e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Qualcomm IPQ6018 PWM controller
+
+maintainers:
+  - Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx>
+
+properties:
+  "#pwm-cells":
+    const: 2
+
+  compatible:
+    const: qcom,pwm-ipq6018
+
+  reg:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  clocks:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  clock-names:
+    const: core
+
+required:
+  - "#pwm-cells"
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - clocks
+  - clock-names
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-ipq6018.h>
+
+    soc {
+        #address-cells = <2>;
+        #size-cells = <2>;
+
+        pwm@1941010 {
+            #pwm-cells = <2>;
+            compatible = "qcom,pwm-ipq6018";
+            reg = <0x0 0x1941010 0x0 0x20>;

These 32 bytes are in the middle of the TCSR block, which is already
partially described by the &tcsr_q6 node, which is described as only
compatible = "syscon" - something no longer accepted by the DT
maintainers.

As such, I think we should adjust the &tcsr_q6 definition to cover the
entire TCSR: 0x01937000 of size 0x21000.


To my knowledge, we can cover the entire TCSR region, so that we can use it
for the other features like qcom,dload-mode as well.


@Rob, should we represent the entire tcsr as a simple-mfd and then have
the pwm and q6 region as children of that? Or can we make the whole
thing as a simple-mfd and a syscon and only describe the pwm as a child?

Regards,
Bjorn

+            clocks = <&gcc GCC_ADSS_PWM_CLK>;
+            clock-names = "core";
+        };
+    };
--
2.30.2


--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux