Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/dp: Make it possible to enable the test pattern

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2021-06-28 17:55, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Mon 28 Jun 19:31 CDT 2021, abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Hi Bjorn

On 2021-06-28 17:22, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> The debugfs interface contains the knobs to make the DisplayPort
> controller output a test pattern, unfortunately there's nothing
> currently that actually enables the defined test pattern.
>
> Fixes: de3ee25473ba ("drm/msm/dp: add debugfs nodes for video pattern
> tests")
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>

This is not how this debugfs node works. This is meant to be used while
running
DP compliance video pattern test.

https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools/-/blob/master/tools/msm_dp_compliance.c

While the compliance test is being run with this msm_dp_compliance app
running,
it will draw the test pattern when it gets the "test_active" from the
driver.

The test pattern which this app draws is as per the requirements of the
compliance test
as the test equipment will match the CRC of the pattern which is drawn.

The API dp_panel_tpg_config() which you are trying to call here draws the DP
test pattern
from the DP controller hardware but not the pattern which the compliance
test expects.


So clearly not an oversight, but rather me not understanding how to use
the test pattern.

You say that I should run msm_dp_compliance while the test is running,
so how do I run the test?

There are two test patterns with different purposes. The one which the msm_dp_compliance draws is strictly for the DP compliance test and it needs even the DPU to draw the frame because
it sets up the display pipeline and just draws the buffer.

That is not what you are looking for here.

So rather than trying to run msm_dp_compliance on your setup, just try calling dp_panel_tpg_config().
We typically just call this API, right after the link training is done.
But if you really need a debugfs node for this, you can write up a separate debugfs for it
Something like:

echo 1 > dp/tpg/en

Lets not disturb this one.


Its just a debug API to call when required during bringup/debug purposes.


Yes, I was trying to isolate the DP code from some misconfiguration in
the DPU during bringup and with this fix the debugfs interface became
useful.


Regards,
Bjorn

Hence this is not the place to call it as it will end up breaking CTS.

Thanks

Abhinav

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_debug.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_debug.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_debug.c
> index 2f6247e80e9d..82911af44905 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_debug.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_debug.c
> @@ -305,6 +305,8 @@ static ssize_t dp_test_active_write(struct file
> *file,
>  				debug->panel->video_test = true;
>  			else
>  				debug->panel->video_test = false;
> +
> +			dp_panel_tpg_config(debug->panel, debug->panel->video_test);
>  		}
>  	}
>  	drm_connector_list_iter_end(&conn_iter);



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux