On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 9:07 PM Bjorn Andersson
<bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu 03 Jun 05:38 CDT 2021, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>
> > Add driver support for Qualcomm PCIe Endpoint controller driver based on
> > the Designware core with added Qualcomm specific wrapper around the
> > core. The driver support is very basic such that it supports only
> > enumeration, PCIe read/write, and MSI. There is no ASPM and PM support
> > for now but these will be added later.
> >
> > The driver is capable of using the PERST# and WAKE# side-band GPIOs for
> > operation and written on top of the DWC PCI framework.
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Siddartha Mohanadoss <smohanad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Siddartha Mohanadoss <smohanad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > [mani: restructured the driver and fixed several bugs for upstream]
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Really nice to see this working!
[...]
> > +static void qcom_pcie_ep_configure_tcsr(struct qcom_pcie_ep *pcie_ep)
> > +{
> > + writel_relaxed(0x0, pcie_ep->tcsr + TCSR_PCIE_PERST_EN);
>
> Please avoid _relaxed accessor unless there's a strong reason, and if so
> document it.
Uhhh, what!? That's the wrong way around from what I've ever seen
anyone say. Have you ever looked at the resulting code on arm32 with
OMAP enabled? It's just a memory barrier and an indirect function call
on every access.
Use readl/writel if you have an ordering requirement WRT DMA,
otherwise use relaxed variants.
> > + writel_relaxed(0x0, pcie_ep->tcsr + TCSR_PERST_SEPARATION_ENABLE);
> > +}
> > +
[...]
> > +static struct platform_driver qcom_pcie_ep_driver = {
> > + .probe = qcom_pcie_ep_probe,
> > + .driver = {
> > + .name = "qcom-pcie-ep",
>
> Skip the indentation of the '='.
>
> > + .suppress_bind_attrs = true,
>
> Why do we suppress_bind_attrs?
Because remove is not handled.
Rob
