Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: power: Introduce 'assigned-performance-states' property

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 12:55, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 02-06-21, 12:45, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > Alright, so it looks like we already have the DT binding that we need for this.
> >
> > That leaves us with the question, at what place should we parse it
> > (call of_get_required_opp_performance_state()) and set the performance
> > state for the device?
> >
> > Does it still make sense to do it while attaching the device to the
> > genpd, you think?
>
> For parsing, yes this is the right place. For getting that into
> effect, whenever the device is supposed to work, i.e. with runtime PM
> somehow.

Okay, thanks for confirming. That would be along the lines of what
Rajendra did in patch2.

Kind regards
Uffe



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux